Running Calorie Calculator · 2024 MET + Keytel Heart Rate

Running Calorie Calculator · 2024 MET + Keytel Heart Rate

Calculate calories burned running — science-backed 2024 MET Compendium plus optional Keytel heart rate. EPOC afterburn, pace correction, food equivalents.

:

Calorie Burn Quick Reference

Weight 5K 10K Half Marathon
50 kg 259 kcal 518 kcal 1093 kcal 2186 kcal
60 kg 311 kcal 622 kcal 1311 kcal 2623 kcal
70 kg 363 kcal 725 kcal 1530 kcal 3060 kcal
80 kg 414 kcal 829 kcal 1749 kcal 3497 kcal
90 kg 466 kcal 932 kcal 1967 kcal 3934 kcal

Estimates based on the simplified formula (1.036 × weight × distance). Actual burn varies with pace, terrain, and fitness level.

How to Calculate Calories Burned Running

  1. Enter your body weight

    Input your weight in kilograms or pounds. Heavier runners burn more calories per kilometer due to greater energy cost of moving body mass.

  2. Choose distance or time mode

    Enter either the distance you ran (with optional pace) or the duration. Adding pace enables the advanced MET-based formula for higher accuracy.

  3. Add optional factors

    For more precise results, enter heart rate, temperature, and terrain grade. Each factor adjusts the calorie estimate based on published exercise physiology research.

  4. View your results

    Get total and net calories burned, EPOC afterburn estimate, food equivalents, multi-sport comparison, and a weight-loss projection calculator.

How the Running Calorie Calculator Works

The RunDida Running Calorie Calculator uses two scientifically validated approaches to estimate your energy expenditure during running, automatically selecting the most appropriate formula based on the information you provide.

When you enter only your body weight and distance, the calculator uses the widely accepted simplified approximation: Calories = 1.036 x weight (kg) x distance (km). This formula, derived from decades of exercise physiology research, provides a reliable estimate that accounts for the average energy cost of running per kilogram of body weight per kilometer. It is independent of speed because, at a population level, the total calorie cost of covering a given distance on foot is remarkably consistent across a range of running speeds.

When you also provide your running pace, the calculator switches to the more precise MET-based formula: Calories = MET x weight (kg) x duration (hours). The MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) value is interpolated from a table of 15 data points spanning speeds from 5.0 km/h (brisk walking) to 22.5 km/h (elite sprinting), based on the Compendium of Physical Activities by Ainsworth et al. This approach captures the real physiological difference between jogging and racing — a runner completing a 10K at 4:00/km pace burns meaningfully more calories per minute than one running at 6:30/km, even though the total distance is the same.

The calculator also computes net calories by subtracting your estimated basal metabolic expenditure for the duration of the exercise. This gives you a clearer picture of the additional energy cost attributable specifically to running, which is more useful for weight management calculations. Finally, the results include food equivalents — expressing your calorie burn in terms of common foods — to provide an intuitive sense of scale that raw numbers alone cannot convey.

The Science Behind Running Calorie Formulas

The energy cost of running has been studied extensively since the pioneering work of Rodolfo Margaria in the 1960s. His research demonstrated that the net energy cost of running on a flat surface is approximately 1 kcal per kilogram of body weight per kilometer, a finding that has been replicated across hundreds of studies and remains the foundation of running calorie estimation.

The gross calorie coefficient used in our simplified formula (1.036 kcal/kg/km) includes the resting metabolic contribution, making it slightly higher than Margaria's net value. This coefficient was validated in a comprehensive review published in the Journal of Sports Sciences and is used by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) in their exercise prescription guidelines.

The MET System

The Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) system provides a standardized way to express the energy cost of physical activities relative to rest. One MET equals approximately 3.5 mL of oxygen consumed per kilogram of body weight per minute, which translates to roughly 1 kcal per kg per hour. The Compendium of Physical Activities, maintained by Dr. Barbara Ainsworth and colleagues at Arizona State University, catalogs MET values for over 800 activities including multiple running speeds.

For running specifically, MET values range from about 7.0 for slow jogging (8 km/h) to over 23.0 for all-out sprinting. The relationship between speed and MET is not perfectly linear — it follows a slightly exponential curve because air resistance increases with the square of velocity and biomechanical efficiency changes at very high speeds. Our calculator uses linear interpolation between 15 empirically measured data points to approximate this curve with high accuracy.

Factors Not Captured by Standard Formulas

Standard calorie formulas assume flat terrain, still air, and a hard surface. Real-world running conditions often deviate significantly:

  • Elevation gain — Running uphill increases energy cost by approximately 5% per 1% grade; the incline calorie calculator applies the ACSM incline equation for exact figures. A hilly 10K route with 200 meters of elevation gain may burn 10-15% more calories than a flat course.
  • Surface type — Running on sand increases energy cost by 20-60% compared to a hard road. Trail running on uneven terrain adds 5-10% due to lateral stabilization demands.
  • Temperature — Exercising in heat increases metabolic rate due to thermoregulation costs (sweating, increased cardiac output). Running in temperatures above 30C (86F) can increase calorie burn by 5-10%.
  • Wind — A strong headwind (20+ km/h) can increase energy cost by 5-8%, while a tailwind provides a roughly equivalent reduction.

These factors explain why calorie calculators provide estimates rather than exact measurements. For precision, laboratory-based indirect calorimetry — measuring oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production — remains the gold standard.

Nutrition and Calorie Management Tips for Runners

Understanding your calorie burn is only useful if you apply it wisely to your nutrition strategy. Here are evidence-based guidelines for managing energy intake around your running.

Fueling Before a Run

For runs under 60 minutes, most runners perform well with their normal meal schedule — eating a balanced meal 2-3 hours before running, or a small carbohydrate-rich snack (a banana, toast with honey) 30-60 minutes prior. For longer runs and races, pre-loading with 1-4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body weight in the 1-4 hours before exercise optimizes glycogen stores, according to ACSM position stands on nutrition for athletic performance.

During-Run Nutrition

For runs lasting over 90 minutes, consuming 30-60 grams of carbohydrates per hour maintains blood glucose and delays glycogen depletion. Popular sources include energy gels (typically 20-25g carbs each), sports drinks, and real food like dates or rice cakes. For ultra-distance events beyond 2.5 hours, research by Dr. Asker Jeukendrup suggests intake can be increased to 60-90 grams per hour if the gut has been trained to tolerate it.

Post-Run Recovery

The 30-60 minute window after running is optimal for glycogen replenishment. Aim for a meal or snack containing 1.0-1.2 grams of carbohydrate per kg of body weight plus 20-30 grams of protein. This combination maximizes both glycogen resynthesis and muscle protein synthesis. Chocolate milk has become a popular recovery option because its 3:1 or 4:1 carb-to-protein ratio closely matches these recommendations.

Weight Management Considerations

If your goal is weight loss through running, avoid the common trap of overestimating calories burned and overcompensating with food. Use the net calorie value from our calculator rather than gross calories when planning your nutrition. A sustainable approach is to aim for a daily calorie deficit of no more than 300-500 calories below your Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE). Larger deficits impair recovery, increase injury risk, and often lead to compensatory overeating.

Be aware of the phenomenon of exercise-induced appetite suppression — intense running temporarily suppresses hunger hormones (ghrelin), but appetite often rebounds later. Planning your post-run meal in advance helps you make nutritionally sound choices rather than impulsive ones when hunger finally strikes.

The Afterburn Effect: EPOC Explained

One often-overlooked component of running energy expenditure is EPOC — Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption, commonly called the afterburn effect. After you finish a run, your body continues to consume oxygen at an elevated rate as it returns to its resting state. This elevated metabolism means you continue burning extra calories for hours after your run ends.

The magnitude of EPOC depends primarily on exercise intensity and duration. Research published in Sports Medicine by Borsheim and Bahr (2003) showed that:

  • Easy runs (60-70% max heart rate) produce minimal EPOC — roughly 5-10 additional calories over the next few hours.
  • Tempo runs and long runs (70-85% max heart rate) generate moderate EPOC — approximately 25-75 additional calories, representing 5-10% of exercise calories.
  • High-intensity intervals (85-100% max heart rate) trigger significant EPOC — potentially 50-150+ additional calories, or 10-15% of exercise calories, with elevated metabolism lasting up to 24 hours.

This is one reason why interval training and tempo runs are popular among runners seeking to maximize calorie burn. A 30-minute interval session may burn fewer gross calories during the workout than a 60-minute easy run, but the EPOC effect narrows the gap considerably. From a pure calorie-burning perspective, a mix of easy runs (for volume) and hard sessions (for EPOC) provides the best overall energy expenditure throughout the week.

Our calculator focuses on the exercise calories themselves and does not include EPOC, as the afterburn effect varies too much between individuals to estimate reliably. Consider it a bonus on top of the calculated values — particularly after your harder training sessions.

How to Use This Calculator

Getting the most from the Running Calorie Calculator is straightforward. Here is a step-by-step guide:

  1. Enter your body weight — Toggle between kilograms and pounds using the unit buttons. Your weight is the single biggest factor in calorie estimation, so use an accurate, recent measurement taken in the morning before eating.
  2. Select or enter your distance — Use the quick-select buttons for standard race distances (5K, 10K, Half Marathon, Marathon) or type a custom distance. Toggle between kilometers and miles as needed.
  3. Optionally add your pace — If you know your running pace, enter it for a more precise MET-based calculation. If you leave pace blank, the calculator uses the simplified distance-based formula, which is still highly accurate for most purposes.
  4. Review your results — The calculator displays total calories, net calories, calories per km and per mile, the MET value used (if pace was provided), and food equivalents to help you visualize your energy expenditure.

Common Use Cases

  • Pre-race nutrition planning — Enter your target marathon or half marathon distance and pace to estimate total calorie burn. Use this to plan your during-race fueling strategy (aim to replace 30-50% of calories burned during events over 90 minutes).
  • Weight management tracking — After each run, log your net calorie burn to understand your true energy deficit. Pair this with a food tracking app for comprehensive calorie balance data.
  • Training load comparison — Compare calorie expenditure across different workouts to understand the energy demands of your training plan. A long slow run and a short fast interval session may burn similar total calories despite feeling very different.
  • Recovery nutrition — Use the total calorie value to determine appropriate post-run refueling. As a rule of thumb, aim to consume 50-75% of exercise calories within 2 hours of finishing, focusing on a mix of carbohydrates and protein.

Calories Burned by Running Distance

How many calories does running burn at different distances? The table below provides estimates based on body weight and common run distances, using the established rule that running burns approximately 1 kcal per kg per km (Margaria et al., 1963). Actual values vary with pace, terrain, and conditions — use the calculator above for a personalized result.

Distance55 kg / 121 lbs70 kg / 154 lbs85 kg / 187 lbs
1 km57 kcal73 kcal88 kcal
1 mile92 kcal117 kcal142 kcal
3 miles275 kcal350 kcal425 kcal
5K (3.1 mi)285 kcal363 kcal440 kcal
10K (6.2 mi)570 kcal725 kcal881 kcal
Half Marathon1,202 kcal1,530 kcal1,858 kcal
Marathon2,405 kcal3,060 kcal3,716 kcal

These values represent gross calories (total energy expenditure including baseline metabolism). For net calories (energy above what you would have burned at rest), subtract roughly 1 kcal per kg per hour of running time. For fueling and recovery planning, gross calories are the more useful number; for weight-management tracking, net calories give a more honest picture of the deficit created by the run.

Calories Burned per Hour of Running

If you track your runs by time rather than distance, here is how many calories running burns per hour at different paces. Values are based on MET data from the 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities (Herrmann et al.).

PaceSpeedMET55 kg70 kg85 kg
7:30 /km8.0 km/h8.3479 kcal610 kcal741 kcal
6:00 /km10.0 km/h9.8566 kcal720 kcal874 kcal
5:00 /km12.0 km/h11.5664 kcal845 kcal1,026 kcal
4:30 /km13.3 km/h12.8739 kcal941 kcal1,142 kcal
4:00 /km15.0 km/h14.5837 kcal1,066 kcal1,294 kcal

Notice that faster paces burn more calories per hour but fewer calories per kilometer. A 30-minute run at 5:00/km covers 6 km and burns roughly 423 kcal (70 kg runner), while a 30-minute jog at 7:30/km covers 4 km and burns about 305 kcal. The faster run burns 39% more calories in the same time, but running longer at an easy pace is often more sustainable for total weekly calorie expenditure.

Sources & References

  1. Herrmann, S.D., Willis, E.A., Ainsworth, B.E., et al. (2024). 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities: A Third Update of the Energy Costs of Human Activities. Journal of Sport and Health Science.
  2. American College of Sports Medicine (2021). ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Wolters Kluwer, 11th Edition.
  3. Margaria, R., Cerretelli, P., Aghemo, P., & Sassi, G. (1963). Energy Cost of Running. Journal of Applied Physiology.
  4. Børsheim, E. & Bahr, R. (2003). Effect of exercise intensity, duration and mode on post-exercise oxygen consumption. Sports Medicine.
  5. LaForgia, J., Withers, R.T., & Gore, C.J. (2006). Effects of exercise intensity and duration on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption. Journal of Sports Sciences.
  6. Keytel, L.R., Goedecke, J.H., Noakes, T.D., et al. (2005). Prediction of energy expenditure from heart rate monitoring during submaximal exercise. Journal of Sports Sciences.
  7. Thomas, D.T., Erdman, K.A., & Burke, L.M. (2016). Nutrition and Athletic Performance: Joint Position Statement. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
  8. Jeukendrup, A. (2014). A step towards personalized sports nutrition: carbohydrate intake during exercise. Sports Medicine.
  9. Racinais, S., Alonso, J.M., Coutts, A.J., et al. (2015). Consensus recommendations on training and competing in the heat. British Journal of Sports Medicine.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories does running a marathon burn?

A marathon (42.195 km / 26.2 miles) typically burns between 2,200 and 3,500 calories, depending primarily on body weight. Using the widely accepted simplified formula (1.036 x weight in kg x distance in km), a 70 kg (154 lb) runner burns approximately 3,060 calories during a full marathon. A lighter 55 kg (121 lb) runner burns around 2,405 calories, while a heavier 90 kg (198 lb) runner may burn close to 3,930 calories.

When pace is factored in, the calorie burn can vary further. Faster runners complete the marathon in less time, so while their MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) value is higher per minute, the total duration is shorter. The result is that total calorie burn is primarily driven by body weight and distance, with pace having a secondary but meaningful effect.

How many calories does running 1 mile burn?

Running 1 mile (1.609 km) burns approximately 85 to 150 calories, depending on body weight. Using the standard 1.036 kcal/kg/km coefficient for gross calories:

  • 55 kg (121 lb): ~92 calories per mile
  • 70 kg (154 lb): ~117 calories per mile
  • 85 kg (187 lb): ~142 calories per mile

A widely-cited shortcut is body weight (lb) × 0.75 ≈ gross calories per mile — a 150 lb runner burns about 113 gross calories per mile (roughly 100-105 net). The metric formula above is more accurate, but the rule-of-thumb works for quick mental math. Pace has a small secondary effect: a 6:00/mi sprint burns about 10% more per mile than a 10:00/mi jog, but your weight and the mile itself do most of the work.

How many calories does a 5K run burn?

A 5K run typically burns between 250 and 450 calories, depending on body weight. Using the simplified formula (1.036 x weight in kg x 5 km):

  • 55 kg (121 lb) runner: ~285 calories
  • 70 kg (154 lb) runner: ~363 calories
  • 85 kg (187 lb) runner: ~440 calories

These numbers represent gross calories. The 5K distance is popular precisely because it offers a meaningful calorie burn in a manageable time frame — most runners complete it in 20-35 minutes, making it an efficient choice for runners who want to maintain a calorie deficit for weight management while minimizing injury risk from excessive mileage.

How many calories does a 10K run burn?

A 10K run burns approximately 570 to 880 calories depending on body weight. Using the gross calorie coefficient (1.036 kcal/kg/km) that this calculator applies:

  • 55 kg (121 lb): ~570 kcal
  • 70 kg (154 lb): ~725 kcal
  • 85 kg (187 lb): ~881 kcal

Margaria et al. (1963) established the net-calorie shortcut of 1 kcal per kg per km — which gives roughly 10 × your body weight in kg. The 1.036 gross coefficient used above adds back the baseline metabolism burned during the run, which is why wearable apps and this calculator report slightly higher numbers than the "weight × 10" shortcut. Your pace has a smaller effect on total 10K calories than most runners expect — a sub-40 10K burns only ~5-10% more per km than an easy 60-minute effort, because the energy cost of moving your body that distance is relatively fixed. Body weight is the dominant factor.

How many calories does 30 minutes of running burn?

Running for 30 minutes at a moderate pace (about 10 km/h or 6:00/km) burns approximately 250 to 450 calories, depending on your body weight:

  • 55 kg (121 lb): ~285 kcal
  • 70 kg (154 lb): ~363 kcal
  • 85 kg (187 lb): ~440 kcal

These estimates assume a flat surface and moderate effort. Running faster increases your MET value and calorie burn per minute, while running slower decreases it. For example, at an easy 7:00/km pace, a 70 kg runner burns about 310 calories in 30 minutes, while at a vigorous 5:00/km pace the same runner burns roughly 420 calories.

Use the By Time mode in our calculator to get a personalized estimate based on your exact weight and pace. For even more accuracy, add your heart rate in the Advanced Options section.

Does running speed affect how many calories you burn?

Yes, running speed affects calorie burn, but perhaps not as dramatically as many runners expect. The primary factors are body weight and total distance covered. However, speed does influence calorie expenditure in two important ways:

  • Higher MET values at faster speeds — Running at 12 km/h (7:27/mi pace) has a MET of approximately 11.0, compared to 8.0 at 8.4 km/h (11:26/mi pace). This means the faster runner burns more calories per minute.
  • EPOC (Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption) — Faster, more intense running triggers a greater afterburn effect, meaning you continue burning elevated calories for hours after your run. High-intensity running can boost post-exercise calorie burn by 6-15% of the exercise calories.

As a practical guideline, a runner who completes 10 km at a fast pace will burn roughly 5-10% more total calories than one who walks the same distance, primarily due to the biomechanical differences between walking and running gaits.

What is a MET value and how is it used to calculate calories?

MET stands for Metabolic Equivalent of Task. It represents the ratio of your working metabolic rate relative to your resting metabolic rate. A MET value of 1.0 equals your energy expenditure at complete rest (approximately 1 kcal per kg of body weight per hour). Running has MET values ranging from about 7.0 (slow jogging) to 23.0 (sprinting at 22+ km/h).

The calorie formula using METs is:

Calories = MET x Body Weight (kg) x Duration (hours)

For example, a 70 kg runner jogging at 9.7 km/h (MET = 9.0) for 1 hour burns: 9.0 x 70 x 1 = 630 calories. The MET system was developed by Dr. Barbara Ainsworth and colleagues in the Compendium of Physical Activities, first published in 1993 and updated regularly, and is used globally as the standard for quantifying physical activity energy expenditure.

What is the difference between gross and net calories?

Gross calories represent the total energy your body expends during exercise, including the calories you would have burned simply being alive (your basal metabolic rate). Net calories subtract the resting energy expenditure for the same time period, giving you the additional calories burned specifically because of running.

For example, if you burn 600 gross calories during a 1-hour run and your resting metabolic rate is about 70 calories per hour (for a 70 kg person), your net calorie burn is approximately 530 calories. Net calories are generally more useful when you are tracking calorie balance for weight management, because your body would have burned those resting calories regardless of whether you ran or sat on the couch.

Our calculator displays both values so you can use whichever is most appropriate for your goals.

How accurate are running calorie calculators?

MET-based running calorie calculators are generally accurate within 10-20% for most runners. The formulas are based on population-level averages from laboratory studies using indirect calorimetry (measuring oxygen consumption). However, several individual factors can cause variation:

  • Running economy — More experienced runners tend to be more efficient, using slightly fewer calories per km than beginners at the same pace.
  • Body composition — Muscle tissue burns more calories than fat tissue. Two people at the same weight but different body fat percentages will have different actual calorie burns.
  • Terrain and conditions — Running uphill, on soft surfaces (sand, trails), or in heat increases energy expenditure beyond what flat-ground formulas predict.
  • Wind resistance — Running into headwinds can increase energy cost by 2-8%.

This is also why Strava and Garmin often disagree by 10-20% for the same activity: Strava estimates calories from speed, weight, and grade-adjusted distance, while Garmin watches with heart-rate sensors add HR-based adjustments. Neither is definitively correct — they are educated estimates using different inputs. For the most accurate personal measurement, a metabolic testing lab can determine your individual oxygen consumption at various speeds. For everyday tracking, MET-based formulas like the one in this calculator provide a reliable and practical estimate.

Does running burn more calories than walking the same distance?

Yes, but the difference is smaller than most people assume. Running burns approximately 20-30% more calories per kilometer than walking the same distance. This might seem counterintuitive since both activities cover the same ground, but there are biomechanical reasons for the difference.

When you run, your body leaves the ground with each stride (the flight phase), which requires more muscular force to propel and then absorb your body weight upon landing. Walking maintains ground contact at all times and uses a pendulum-like gait that is inherently more energy-efficient. Additionally, running generates more heat and wind resistance, both of which add to energy expenditure.

The widely used approximation of 1.036 kcal per kg per km for running compares to roughly 0.8 kcal per kg per km for brisk walking. So a 70 kg person running 5 km burns about 363 calories, versus approximately 280 calories walking the same distance — a difference of about 83 calories.

Does jogging burn fewer calories than running?

Per hour, yes — jogging burns fewer calories than running. A 70 kg person jogging at 7:30/km (MET 8.3) burns about 610 kcal/hour, while running at 5:00/km (MET 11.5) burns about 845 kcal/hour — a 39% difference.

However, per kilometer the difference is much smaller — roughly 5-10%. This is because the energy cost of moving your body weight a given distance is relatively constant regardless of speed (the famous 1 kcal/kg/km rule). The main advantage of running faster is covering more distance in the same time, which increases total calorie expenditure per session.

For weight management, consistency matters more than intensity. A sustainable jogging habit that you maintain 4-5 times per week will burn more total calories than occasional hard runs. Use our Training Pace Calculator to find the right balance between easy and hard efforts.

Should I eat back the calories I burn running?

This depends on your goal. If you are training for performance and need to maintain or build fitness, you should replace most or all of the calories burned during running. Chronic underfueling leads to Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S), which can impair recovery, bone health, hormonal function, and immune response.

If your goal is weight loss, creating a moderate calorie deficit by not fully replacing exercise calories can be effective, but the deficit should not exceed 300-500 calories per day beyond your run. Using net calories (rather than gross) for tracking gives a more realistic picture of the additional energy you expended.

A practical approach: for runs under 60 minutes, most runners do not need to consume calories during the run. For runs over 90 minutes, consuming 30-60 grams of carbohydrates per hour during the run supports performance and recovery. Post-run, prioritize a meal or snack containing both protein and carbohydrates within 30-60 minutes to optimize glycogen replenishment and muscle repair.

Does running on a treadmill burn the same calories as outdoor running?

Flat treadmill running burns slightly fewer calories than outdoor running — typically 2-5% less — because the moving belt assists stride recovery and there is no wind resistance to overcome. To match the energy cost of outdoor running, exercise scientists recommend setting the treadmill to a 1-2% incline. Research by Jones and Doust (1996, Journal of Sports Sciences) found that at a 1% grade, treadmill and outdoor running burn nearly identical calories across typical running velocities (2.92-5.0 m/s, i.e., 3:20-5:44/km or 5:22-9:15/mi).

The calorie displays on consumer treadmills are often 15-30% too high because they rarely use your actual weight or a pace-specific MET value. For a more accurate estimate, enter your weight, the treadmill's speed, and any incline into this calculator (the grade slider in Advanced Options applies the ACSM hill equation). A 70 kg runner doing 30 minutes at 10 km/h on a flat treadmill burns around 350 kcal — not the 500+ that many machines display.

References 9 peer-reviewed sources
  1. Herrmann, S.D., Willis, E.A., Ainsworth, B.E., et al. (2024). 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities: A Third Update of the Energy Costs of Human Activities. Journal of Sport and Health Science. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2023.10.010
  2. American College of Sports Medicine (2021). ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 11th Edition. Wolters Kluwer.
  3. Margaria, R., Cerretelli, P., Aghemo, P., & Sassi, G. (1963). Energy Cost of Running. Journal of Applied Physiology. doi:10.1152/jappl.1963.18.2.367
  4. Børsheim, E. & Bahr, R. (2003). Effect of exercise intensity, duration and mode on post-exercise oxygen consumption. Sports Medicine. doi:10.2165/00007256-200333140-00002
  5. LaForgia, J., Withers, R.T., & Gore, C.J. (2006). Effects of exercise intensity and duration on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption. Journal of Sports Sciences. doi:10.1080/02640410600552064
  6. Keytel, L.R., Goedecke, J.H., Noakes, T.D., et al. (2005). Prediction of energy expenditure from heart rate monitoring during submaximal exercise. Journal of Sports Sciences. doi:10.1080/02640410470001730089
  7. Thomas, D.T., Erdman, K.A., & Burke, L.M. (2016). Nutrition and Athletic Performance: Joint Position Statement. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000000852
  8. Jeukendrup, A. (2014). A step towards personalized sports nutrition: carbohydrate intake during exercise. Sports Medicine. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0148-z
  9. Racinais, S., Alonso, J.M., Coutts, A.J., et al. (2015). Consensus recommendations on training and competing in the heat. British Journal of Sports Medicine. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-094915